Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Case Rep Womens Health ; 42: e00612, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737718

RESUMEN

NMDA-R encephalitis is an autoimmune encephalitis that is known to be associated with ovarian teratomas. Eighty to 100 % of patients initially present with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Early recognition and intervention are critical to management and prognosis. This case demonstrates non-specific presenting symptoms of NMDA-R encephalitis. A 32-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with headache, nausea, vomiting, and photophobia. She was discharged with probable aseptic meningitis. Eight days later, she represented with delusional thought content, perseverative speech, and bizarre behavior. Cerebrospinal fluid studies showed elevated protein and mild pleocytosis. A computed tomography scan with contrast showed a 35-mm complex cystic lesion in the right adnexa, which was resected. Confirmatory pathology showed a mature cystic teratoma. Paraneoplastic panel later resulted positive for NMDA-R encephalitis. The patient was treated with methylprednisolone, IVIG, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. The clinical course was complicated by a hypersensitivity reaction to rituximab, non-convulsive status epilepticus requiring intubation, dysphagia requiring a PEG placement, a rectal ulcer causing acute blood loss anemia requiring multiple blood transfusions, bilateral hearing loss, and a left lung pneumothorax. The patient's mood, cognition, and motor function were favorably improving 19 months after diagnosis. This case illustrates presenting signs of NMDA-R encephalitis in a young woman as headache and altered mental status followed by psychosis and epilepsy. Treatment should involve a multidisciplinary team and be individualized and escalated in patients with worsening clinical status refractory to first-line therapy. Further research is warranted to understand the optimal treatment strategy for this disease.

2.
Work ; 73(2): 377-382, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35938279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic led to rapid expansion of telehealth services. This was speculated to improve healthcare access among underserved populations, including individuals unable to take time off work or arrange transportation. OBJECTIVE: We completed a quality improvement project to evaluate the feasibility of hybrid consultations that combined televisits and abbreviated in-person visits for neuromuscular referrals. METHODS: Using a censoring date of August 5, 2021, we reviewed all outpatient neuromuscular consultations from August 5, 2020 to February 5, 2021. For both hybrid and traditional in-person consultations, we reviewed no-show rates, completion rates of ordered diagnostic workup, and billing codes. For hybrid consultations only, we also reviewed intervals between initial televisit and subsequent examination and rates of video-enhanced versus audio-only televisits. RESULTS: During the study period, we completed 153 hybrid and 59 in-person new-patient consultations (no-show rates 9% and 27% respectively.) For hybrid consultations, 77% and 73% of laboratory and imaging studies were completed respectively, compared to 89% and 91% for in-person consultations. For hybrid visits, average RVUs (a marker for reimbursement) per consultation depended on whether audio-only televisits were billed as telephone calls or E/M visits per insurance payer rules, while video-enhanced televisits were uniformly billed as E/M visits. This resulted in average RVUs between 2.09 and 2.26, compared to 2.30 for in-person consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth-based hybrid neuromuscular consultations are feasible with minor caveats. However, the future of telehealth may be restricted by decreasing reimbursement rates particularly for audio-only televisits, limiting its potential to improve healthcare access.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Telemedicina/métodos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Derivación y Consulta
3.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 12(3): 218-222, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35747546

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Medical errors are estimated to cause 7,000 deaths and cost 17-29 billion USD per year, but there is a lack of published real-world data on preventable errors, in particular in hospital-based neurology. We sought to characterize the profile of errors that occur on the inpatient neurology services at our institution to inform strategies on future error prevention. Methods: We reviewed all cases of preventable errors occurring on the inpatient neurology services from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, logged in institutional error reporting systems and reviewed at departmental morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MC). Each case was characterized by primary category of error, level of harm as determined by the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Common Format Harm Scale version 1.2, primary intervention, and recurrence within 1 year, with a final censoring date of June 30, 2021. Results: Of 72 cases, 43 (60%) were attributed to errors in clinical decision making and 20 (28%) to systems or electronic health record-related errors. The majority of cases resulted in in-conference education on systems-based errors (29%) at departmental M&MCs followed by in-conference education on clinical neurology (25%). Among errors classified primarily as clinical, 28% were addressed via systems-based interventions including in-conference education on systems issues and changes in written protocol. In 23 cases (32%), a similar error recurred within 1 year of the presentation. In total, 7 cases (10%) resulted in a change in written protocol, none with recurrences. Discussion: Systems-based interventions may reduce both clinical and systems-based errors, and protocol changes are effective when feasible. Given the important goal of optimizing care for every patient, quality leaders should conduct continuous audits of preventable errors and quality improvement systems in their clinical areas.

4.
Muscle Nerve ; 64(3): 361-364, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131929

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The initial surge of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in early 2020 led to widespread cancellation of elective medical procedures in the United States, including nonurgent outpatient and inpatient electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies. As certain regions later showed a downtrend in daily new cases, EDx laboratories have reopened under the guidance of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). In our reopening experience guided by the AANEM, we measured relevant outcomes to determine further workflow adaptations. We aimed to detail our experience and share the lessons learned. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical volumes, billing data, diagnosis distributions, and rates of COVID-19 exposure and transmission among patients and staff in our EDx laboratory during the first 6 months of reopening, starting on June 1, 2020. For context, we detailed the recent AANEM guidelines we adopted at our laboratory, supplemented by other consensus statements. RESULTS: We completed 816 outpatient studies from June 1 to December 1, 2020, reaching 97% of the total volume and 97% of total billing compared with the same time period in 2019. The average relative value units per study were similar. There were no major shifts in diagnosis distributions. We completed 10 of 12 requested inpatient studies during this period. There were no known COVID-19 transmissions between patients and staff. DISCUSSION: Our experience suggests that it is possible to safely operate an EDx laboratory under the guidance of the AANEM and other experts, with clinical volume and billing rates comparable to pre-pandemic baselines.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/normas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Electrodiagnóstico/normas , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Flujo de Trabajo , Centros Médicos Académicos/métodos , Centros Médicos Académicos/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Electrodiagnóstico/tendencias , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Tumour Biol ; 35(12): 12619-26, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25260883

RESUMEN

In order to determine the expression pattern of miR-101 in epithelial ovarian neoplasms and assess the functions and mechanism of miR-101 in tumorigenesis, we detected the expression of miR-101 and zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) in normal, benign, and malignant ovarian tissues and used miR-101 lentivirus infection to increase miR-101 expression in ovarian cancer cells and drug-resistant cancer cells. We found that miR-101 was underexpressed in epithelial ovarian cancer tissues, which significantly correlated with poor cell differentiation, advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages, and ovarian cancer cell cisplatin resistance. miR-101 overexpression decreased the expression of EZH2, reduced proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells, and resensitized drug-resistant cancer cells to cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity, suggesting the important role miR-101 plays in ovarian cancer that may be associated with its function as a regulator targeting EZH2. Our findings show the potential of miR-101 as a diagnostic marker and new therapeutic target for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Cisplatino/farmacología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , MicroARNs/genética , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Interferencia de ARN , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Apoptosis/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular/genética , Proliferación Celular , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Proteína Potenciadora del Homólogo Zeste 2 , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Complejo Represivo Polycomb 2/genética , Adulto Joven
6.
Health Care Women Int ; 31(10): 938-45, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20835942

RESUMEN

Grand-grand multiparous (GGMP) women, that is women with ≥10 births, appear less likely to receive epidural anesthesia for labor/delivery than non-GGMP women. Eighteen months' data were collected. 277/16,331 laboring females were GGMP (mean age: 39.6 ± 3.3 years; mean: 11.3 ± 1.5 births), 83/258 (32.2%) delivered vaginally with epidural anesthesia versus 7,203/15,711 (45.8%) non-GGMP with epidural anesthesia (p < .0051; Odds Ratio = 0.56). Among GGMP women, 23/42 cesarean sections (55%) were emergency versus 1,011/1,631 (62%) among non-GGMP women (Odds Ratio: 0.74). Mean birth weight of GGMP babies: 3,428 ± 504 gms; mean Apgar (1'): 8.8; there were six sets of twins. Most GGMP women were healthy, but epidural anesthesia was used less frequently for labor/delivery than in non-GGMP births.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Obstétrica , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Paridad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto , Periodo Periparto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...